• 首 页
  • 成 员
  • 科 研
  • 教 学
  • 资 源
  • 视 频
  • 博 客
  • 相 册
  • 登 录
  • 首 页
  • 成 员
  • 科 研
  • 教 学
  • 资 源
  • 视 频
  • 博 客
  • 相 册
  • 登 录
首 页/资源/研究文献/Word order predicts memory

Word order predicts memory

1 浏览 0

编辑 ColingSNNU
2019年2月11日

原题:Word order predicts a native speakers’ working memory

 

推荐 | Word order predicts memory

A new study from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology suggests that the syntax of a language might influence how a speaker processes and recalls sequential information.

 

推荐 | Word order predicts memory

 

The research team traveled the world to run memory tests in eight different human cultures speaking different languages.

Credit: MPI f. Evolutionary Anthropology

 

Memory plays a crucial role in our lives, and several studies have already investigated how we store and retrieve information under different conditions. Typically, stimuli presented at the beginning and at the end of a list are recalled better than stimuli from the middle. But are these findings universal and generalizable across languages and cultures?

The group, including psychologists, linguists and biologists from five different countries, traveled across the world to run memory tests in eight different human cultures speaking different languages. “The best part of this project was to cross deserts and seas to reach amazing people speaking the most wonderful languages ever, from Sidaama, to Khoekhoe and Khmer,” says Amici, “and know that these languages may provide them with a unique vision of the world.”

The relationship between language and thought is controversial. One hypothesis is that language fosters habits of processing information that are retained even in non-linguistic domains. Languages, for instance, vary in their branching direction. In typical right-branching (RB) languages, like Italian, the head of the sentence usually comes first, followed by a sequence of modifiers that provide additional information about the head (e.g. “the man who was sitting at the bus stop”). In contrast, in left-branching (LB) languages, like Japanese, modifiers generally precede heads (e.g. “who was sitting at the bus stop, the man”). In RB languages, speakers could process information incrementally, given that heads are presented first and modifiers rarely affect previous parsing decisions. In contrast, LB structures can be highly ambiguous until the end, because initial modifiers often acquire a clear meaning only after the head has been parsed. Therefore, LB speakers may need to retain initial modifiers in working memory until the head is encountered to comprehend the sentence.

来源:ScienceDaily,“阅读原文”浏览全文

 

本文对你有帮助吗?

点赞  一般
相关文章
  • Emotional Implications of Metaphor
  • 《剑桥英语语言百科全书(第3版)》
  • Exploring the Situational Interface of Translation and Cognition
  • Mind Style and Cognitive Grammar
  • 2018 RCL特刊 “幽默认知”
  • Why Nouns Slow Us Down
留言评论 取消回复

请输入验证码 *超出时限。 请再次填写验证码。

热门资源
  • 语言学术语在线词典
  • 句法树形图生成工具三剑客
  • 认知语言学名家十讲系列(Brill Ten Lectures)
  • 语言学免费课程资源
  • 国际语言学会议论文OA汇编
资源分类
  • 会议资料 5
  • 学习资料 8
  • 学术名家 1
  • 学科工具 4
  • 研究文献 19
  • 语料数据 2
CoLing@SNNU
认知语言学部落:陕西师范大学语言与认知研究所官方网站。致力于认知语言学研究和学术推广,开拓学科发展思路,整合资源,力求创新。
我 们
  • 机构简介
  • 团队成员
联 络
  • 张韧教授Email
  • 网站编辑Email
网 络
  • CogLing公众号
  • 知乎专栏“语言与认知”
  • 隐私条款
  • 常见问题
  • 苏ICP备20005018号-3
  • © 2021-2025 陕师大·语言与认知研究所 版权所有